It (RadVC)
looks very promising. Its great to see such creative add-on product for Visual C++
coming to market.
Walter Sullivan
Lead Program Manager, MFC/ATL (Microsoft Visual C++) |
These (hooking) techniques are so
powerful, that it is entirely possible to morph the application to look
entirely different. If you don't believe me, check out RadVC.
- Nick Hodapp
Product Manager, Microsoft Visual C++
-
Undocumented Visual C++
|
A nice
product, and I hope that it is not, like Stacker and many other good things, immediately
cloned by Microsoft. (M.B.)
|
I've just
completed downloading it and in my opinion it's quite useful. It shows what VC++ could be
like if Microsoft only wanted . (J. J.)
|
You
should dangle RadVC in front of Bill the Gates, sell out for a vast amount of cash (at
least, you should, because this product makes Visual C actually visual at last, and in
step with VB, and ...) and then move on to better things than helping Bill to catch up.
(M.B.) |
I'm a
project manager at (snip..). we are currently developing a VB6.0 application based on
highly integration with the webbrowser control , internet components and other third party
components (snip..) as a result of our trying new technology. doing MFC directly seems
impossible , and when I heard about your product I was very excited. (C. B.)
|
What I
like about RadVC is that it is still good ol' C++ on the backend! (C.R.)
|
Excellent idea, and looks nice (M.K.)
|
Your
add-in was like a god-send!...has much promise. (J. W.)
|
All in all, we are impressed with your product.
(P.L.)
|
As we are
doing programming in VC++ and VB, with much switching between, and find VB a much faster
development environment, your product looks very interesting. (D.V.)
|
We
downloaded the trial and it's very close to what we are looking for. (G. M.)
|
Your
RADVC package looks really cool. I use Borland C++ Builder most of the time and only
resort to VC when the executables must be very small and very fast. I like VC
a lot but I
am much more productive with C++ Builder. It seems like your product might change that
though. (P. M.)
|
I have four more days on the trial testing of your product and I
just want to say that you have developed a very good program for rapid development of
software. Up to this time I am very impressed with your Visual Basic - way of developing
quick and easy programs. I know that some people would rather program in the traditional
way in C++ but I think if there is an easier way to write less code and do it quickly, why
not? (J. L.)
|
I
downloaded RadVC, installed it, and tried it. I must say that it is a great concept! I
really like the way you have integrated your VB-style forms with the MFC code, so they can
co-exist. (M. T.)
|
It is an
excellent product. I use VB as my main development language, so (with RadVC) I feel right
at home.. I would recommend it to anybody and it has a great price. (J. F.)
|
The product is excellent-- the vision is superb...It proves that
there could be one IDE with VB/VC/VJ/VID, all-in-one. Learn one and you learn them all.
(M. K.)
|
I wonder why MS hasn't already integrated this type of IDE into
MSVC++ given the success of VB. (K.W.)
|
Good! I
like it. It does simple things simpler! This is something that MSVC cannot support, and we
needed it. (H. N.)
|
My god
what have you done to Microsoft Visual C ??? It has made a good product ( for me ) a 1000
times better. Thanks for putting in what Microsoft left out. (S. F.)
|
You have a
great product. If Microsoft was smart they would buy you out. You have produced the
interface they have long needed for Visual C++. [B.B.] |
I have to say that I'm impressed by the amount of work you've put
into this project. It's a worthwhile cause -- one that Microsoft could and should have
pursued themselves.
[Alvaro Mendez]
|
(RadVC
is)...a fantastic product,... one of the most valuable software
packages that I own. I am an experienced C and C++ programmer
from DOS, Unix, and VAX environments in the 1980's, who
switched to VB in the early 90's after discovering that it took almost
1000 lines of C code to display "Hello World" on the screen
in Windows. RadVC is just what I needed to bring me back to C++.
[Tom Holderby]
|
Fantastic ! This is the best thing I've seen since Borland
C++ Builder. I am an avid VB developer, I have been since version 1.0 of VB (even had a go at
VBDOS). I do have a knowledge of C but that was in the DOS world. I stayed away from VC++ for the most part, only using it when I needed to. Why?
Because the IDE is a pain in the rear. Why is it that a C++ MUST be hard to use? Do C++
programmers not feel they are getting any work done if they don't spend hours mucking with a poor IDE?
At any rate it is nice to be able to seamlessly move from one language to another and have the IDE work in a similar fashion.
[David Winter]
|
Your tool
is super cool! I got mute when I saw the baby. I wish Bill would
integrate your tool in .NET (and the future MSVC++ boxes) and pay you
a great deal of royalties, because you deserve it! You EARNED it!!! Oh, this is so
much fun. Your baby should definitely BE in the Developer Studio/.NET
BOX!!! It is amazing for me that Bill (and his wallet) didn't yet pay
you a "visit"! Man, your tool is simply FANTASTIC!!! (and I
do work in the development tools industry myself!).
[Daniel
Marinescu]
|
..After
seeing and using your technology, it occurred to me that you have the
basis for what I believe the world really needs -- a truly
cross-platform C++ object model and RAD environment.
[Michael J. Emswiler]
|
Wonderful
article -- I was wondering. Did Microsoft by any chance decide to use
RadVC's look and feel as the basis for that of Visual C++.NET? I can't
help but think how hauntingly similar the two interfaces look. I bet
it at least provided some inspiration at least.
Brian Hart
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of California, Irvine
|
Actually,
the first thing that came to mind when I saw RadVC was "Wow...
they copied the Visual Basic IDE...
Simon Cooke
|
This is an excellent product!
I downloaded your trial today, and in less
than 30 minutes had a simple form with some controls working the way I
wished.
I have been developing in Delphi and Visual
Basic for many years, but have always stayed away from Visual C++
because it lacked a visual form/control builder.
[John Novotney]
|
(Product
review at microsoft.public.vc.ide_general)
|
Easy movement
back and forth between VB and VC modes...VB mode looks and behaves pretty much like VB.
Double-click in Project View to get to a dialog. Double-click on a control to pop up the
RadVC CodeBar (similar to code bar in VB; select a control and select an event, which is
thankfully not in WM_ format, to get to the handler code skeleton for that event).
|
|
Interesting
means of control initialization (uses the string table in the RadVC control Create
methods)...means no huge generated code sections cluttering up the landscape.
|
|
3-button
toolbar is, like the add-in, unobtrusive. It doesn't force itself upon you or make
wholesale changes to the IDE.
|
|
Generated code
is small and also unobtrusive; most of the logic is hidden in the RFC classes (which are
smart wrappers around MFC)
|
|
Easy, familiar
step-in for VB programmers moving to VC. (G.J)
|
|